WHY DO WE NEED A LAWYER?: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF DIVORCE CASES
AbstractWhy do people choose to represent themselves in a divorce? Is it purely a question of economics, or do people avoid lawyers for other reasons (as has been suggested by some research)? What about the perception of the legal profession that self-represented divorce litigants are at a disadvantage? Are divorce litigants better off when they are represented by legal counsel? This article attempts to address some of these issues by drawing on empirical data. We set out to examine divorcing couples within a wide range of incomes, and who are living in a county with urban, suburban and rural communities. Thus, we selected Waukesha County, Wisconsin; a county adjacent to Milwaukee, Wisconsin. We believe that by studying a specific population with such diverse levels of income and living arrangements we have taken a snapshot of how choices about lawyer representation during the divorce process are affecting average Americans. We examined a random sample of 567 divorce cases initiated in 2005. In an attempt to identify possible reasons for a decision to proceed pro se, we examined the relationship between various factors (such as age, income level or gender) and pro se status. We also attempted to examine the question of whether pro se litigants are worse off than those represented by legal counsel. The difficulty of defining success in the context of divorce litigation makes it especially hard to assess the impact of having attorney representation as opposed to proceeding pro se. For reasons discussed in detail later, we looked at two factors: the correlation between representation status and the likelihood of maintenance awards, and the correlation between representation status and the length of the divorce case.
How to Cite
. WHY DO WE NEED A LAWYER?: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF DIVORCE CASES. Journal of Law and Family Studies, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 1, mar. 2010. Available at: <http://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlfs/article/view/283>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2017.
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).