VICTIM OPINION STATEMENTS: PROVIDING JUSTICE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES
AbstractThis Note addresses in five parts the need for victims to have an opportunity to voice their opinions on the type and length of sentence that should be imposed on a defendant in a capital case. Part I gives a brief history of Booth v. Maryland and Payne v. Tennessee and address the ambiguities resulting from the Supreme Court's lack of clarity on whether a victim opinion statement may be admitted during the sentencing portion of a capital trial. Part II then outlines the lower court split and discusses how some courts perceive Payne as holding that the Eighth Amendment creates a per se bar against a victim's sentencing recommendation in a capital case. Part III reviews the reasoning of Professor Paul Cassell-one of the Nation's leading experts on victim's rights-for supporting the admission of victim impact statements during capital cases. Next, part IV addresses the opposition to the admissibility of victim opinion statements as violating the Eighth Amendment. Part V concludes by providing a brief recap of why the Supreme Court needs to rule with finality that allowing victims to submit their opinions during the sentencing phase of a capital trial does not violate the Eighth Amendment.
How to Cite
. VICTIM OPINION STATEMENTS: PROVIDING JUSTICE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES. Journal of Law and Family Studies, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 2, aug. 2010. Available at: <http://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlfs/article/view/368>. Date accessed: 25 nov. 2017.
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).