INTERNATIONAL CUSTODY BATTLES: THE NOT SO CURIOUS CASE OF DAVID GOLDMAN
AbstractThe Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction ("Hague Convention") was adopted in 1980 in response to concerns about a growing number of child abductions into other countries. The Hague Convention is an international standard for the abduction of children across countries and international custody disputes. It applies to the wrongful removal or retention of children to the eighty-two countries, including the United States, which have signed the Convention. The United States has signed additional treaties with sixty-eight of the eighty-two countries to uphold the Hague Convention. When a child is wrongfully removed to a different country, a parent can apply through his or her country of origin, as well as the country the child was taken to, to begin the process of returning the child back to their initial country of residence. This process is fraught with problems, as countries may choose not to comply with the Hague Convention or may demonstrate a pattern of noncompliance due to other factors like judicial inefficiency or an inability to enforce through the police force. ¬† ¬†Unfortunately the case of David and Sean Goldman is not unique, but it has brought to light the international facet of child custody disputes and the need to look to other alternatives or revise the Hague Convention to prevent misuse of domestic procedures and international law to violate the rights of parents and children. Part I of this Note discusses the international framework of Hague Convention and the case of David and Sean Goldman. Next, Part II discusses the limitations of the Hague Convention and the problems that confront parents who are attempting to gain custody in international disputes. Part III explores changes or alternatives to the Hague Convention. These include pressures by governments, jurisdiction granted to international courts, or amending the Hague Convention to provide for better, more efficient, resolutions, while still protecting the rights of parents and children.
How to Cite
. INTERNATIONAL CUSTODY BATTLES: THE NOT SO CURIOUS CASE OF DAVID GOLDMAN. Journal of Law and Family Studies, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 2, aug. 2010. Available at: <http://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlfs/article/view/370>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2017.
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).