GETTING DIVORCED ONLINE: PROCEDURAL AND OUTCOME JUSTICE IN ONLINE DIVORCE MEDIATION
AbstractIn this paper we discuss a study of the experiences of 126 individuals who participated in online divorce mediation in the Netherlands. Divorce is generally a dispute in which the parties must distribute a large pool of assets and responsibilities. The distributive dimension of divorce creates the expectation that one of the parties may be more content with the outcome than the other. The results of this study show that the divorcees do not differ substantially in how they perceive the quality of the online procedure and the quality of the outcome. Both parties assigned relatively high scores to both the procedure and the outcome. This finding suggests that the online mediation process and its outcomes are perceived as equally fair by both parties. However, there is a noticeable distinction within the couples in the reported costs of the procedure. Men tend to report higher monetary and time costs, whereas women are more concerned with the intangible costs of the online mediation-negative emotions and damage to important relationships. Overall, our findings suggest that online divorce mediation is a viable alternative to both offline mediation and other more traditional modes of dispute resolution in divorce.
How to Cite
. GETTING DIVORCED ONLINE: PROCEDURAL AND OUTCOME JUSTICE IN ONLINE DIVORCE MEDIATION. Journal of Law and Family Studies, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 1, apr. 2012. Available at: <http://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlfs/article/view/635>. Date accessed: 25 nov. 2017.
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).