| INTRODUCTION: PATH FORWARD OR ROAD TO NOWHERE? IMPLICATIONS OF THE 2009 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES REPORT ON THE FORENSIC SCIENCES |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
Daniel S. Medwed |
|
| THE NAS/NRC REPORT ON FORENSIC SCIENCE: A PATH FORWARD FRAUGHT WITH PITFALLS |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
D. Michael Risinger |
|
| INDEPENDENT CRIME LABORATORIES: THE PROBLEM OF MOTIVATIONAL AND COGNITIVE BIAS |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
Paul C. Giannelli |
|
| SWIRLS AND WHORLS: LITIGATING POST-CONVICTION CLAIMS OF FINGERPRINT MISIDENTIFICATION AFTER THE NAS REPORT |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
Jacqueline McMurtrie |
|
| WILL HISTORY BE SERVITUDE?: THE NAS REPORT ON FORENSIC SCIENCE AND THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
Jane C. Moriarty |
|
| C.S.I. BULLS#!T: THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, MELENDEZ-DIAZ V. MASSACHUSETTS, AND FUTURE CHALLENGES TO FORENSIC SCIENCE AND FORENSIC EXPERTS |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
Joelle Anne Moreno |
|
| EVIDENCE THEORY AND THE NAS REPORT ON FORENSIC SCIENCE |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
Michael S. Pardo |
|
| STABLE ISOTOPES AND COURTS |
Abstract
PDF
Print on Demand
|
|
James R. Ehleringer, Scott M. Matheson, Jr. |
|
| LONG OVERDUE: UTAH’S INCOMPLETE APPROACH TO EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM |
Abstract
PDF
|
|
Steven J. Joffee |
|
