Torture: The Moral, Pragmatic, and Legal Implications

Abstract

What are the moral, pragmatic, and legal dimensions of torture as an interrogation method? This paper frames torture historically, and then explores the moral framework of torture through the contrast of consequentialist and deontological ethics systems. Pragmatic concerns are addressed by reviewing the reliability of information disclosed under torture and by gauging its efficacy in the Global War on Terror. Next, the paper’s legal analysis focuses on the codified definitions and prohibitions of torture found in domestic and international law. I conclude that in order to uphold the rule of law and the value of justice, the United States should acknowledge that torture is immoral and unreliable, officially recognize that the U.S. has made use of torture in the Global War on Terror, investigate and prosecute agents of the U.S. government who have engaged in or authorized torture, and open itself to investigation by the United Nations Committee Against Torture and the International Court of Justice.
Published
2014-07-10
How to Cite
. Torture: The Moral, Pragmatic, and Legal Implications. Hinckley Journal of Politics, [S.l.], v. 15, july 2014. ISSN 2163-0798. Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/HJP/article/view/1233>. Date accessed: 14 june 2024.
Section
Student Papers

Keywords

Politics; Government; International Relations; Military; Torture