Feasibility of the Lake Powell Pipeline: Development Act and Proposed Water Conservation Alternatives
Abstract
In 2006, after four years of drought, the Utah Legislature was tasked with addressing the increasingly limited water supplies throughout the state. At first, state agencies decided the construction of a pipeline from Lake Powell to Washington and Kane counties would meet the water needs of a growing population in southwestern Utah. However appealing the solution first appeared on paper, many in the academic and scientific community are now skeptical of the feasibility of the project as well as its economic and ecological impacts. In addition, alternative measures to meet future water needs are numerous, inexpensive, and feasible, which calls the proposed policy into question—especially in a scally conservative state such as Utah. Using current data projections, legislative audits, and a range of reports, this paper aims to determine the economic and ecological feasibility of the Lake Powell Pipeline Project. Furthermore, this paper will review the strengths and weaknesses of three alternative policies: instream flows, rainwater harvesting, and agricultural water conversion. Based on a comparison of these various policies, this paper will then conclude with suggestions for the best outcome for the state of Utah.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright over their work, while allowing the conference to place this unpublished work under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely access, use, and share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and its initial presentation at this conference.
b) Authors are able to waive the terms of the CC license and enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution and subsequent publication of this work (e.g., publish a revised version in a journal, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial presentation at this conference.
c) In addition, authors are encouraged to post and share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before and after the conference.
d) The Author grants Marriott Library the nonexclusive, perpetual, worldwide, irrevocable right to reproduce, distribute, display, publish, archive, preserve, digitize, transcribe, translate, provide access and transmit their work (in whole or in part) for any non-commercial purpose including but not limited to archiving, academic research, and marketing in such tangible electronic formats as may be in existence now or hereafter developed.
e) Marriott Library may elect, in its sole discretion, not to exercise the rights granted herein.
f) Author shall retain copyright in and to the Work and Marriott Library shall provide proper attribution in its exercise of the rights granted herein.
g) Author is solely responsible and will indemnify and hold Marriott Library and/or the University of Utah harmless for any third party claims related to the Work as submitted for publication.
