RACISM AND THE LAW: SLAVERY, INTEGRATION, AND MODERN RESEGREGATION IN AMERICA
Abstract
"The destinies of the two races in this country are indissolubly linked together, and the interests of both require that the common government of all shall not permit the seeds of race hate to be planted under the sanction of law," declared Justice Harlan in his ringing dissent to Plessy v. Ferguson. Yet in 1896, his vision of a "colorblind" America was marred by centuries of racism and prejudice. Similarly, despite lofty ideals, the Supreme Court's historical treatment of African Americans in the United States stands in sharp contrast to the declaration that all are created equal. "Other racial injustices in this nation's history are grave, but are different in part because the injuries were less fundamentally legal in nature." Nevertheless, the Court in Brown v. Board of Education "did what, until 1954, neither the presidents nor the Congress could or would do" by abolishing government-imposed racial segregation. Today, the Court continues to struggle with this mandate as demographic and economic factors contribute to the resegregation of neighborhoods and schools. Professor Lynette L. Danley's The Diary of M.A.D. Black Mama: The Blessings of Reality, gives a vivid illustration of how racism and the law continue to impact America. This paper will introduce Professor Danley's monologue by providing a brief overview of the major Supreme Court decisions that have taken America from slavery and segregation to integration. It will also explore the sharply divided Court decisions that have allowed modern de facto resegregation to occur. However, a comprehensive discussion of the dozens of landmark "race" cases and their accompanying historical contexts is beyond the scope of this paper. Additionally, while many minority groups have been disadvantaged by the legal system, this paper will only address the plight of African Americans. Rather than presenting a voluminous historical account, this paper tells the story of racism in American law through a few critical Supreme Court cases that have shaped societal views of race and equality in America. Â
How to Cite
.
RACISM AND THE LAW: SLAVERY, INTEGRATION, AND MODERN RESEGREGATION IN AMERICA.
Journal of Law and Family Studies, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 2, dec. 2009.
Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlfs/article/view/213>. Date accessed: 22 dec. 2024.
Issue
Section
Monologues and Commentary
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).