THE FLAWED LOGIC OF CONGRESS IN THE ECONOMIC STIMULUS ACT OF 2008
Abstract
On February 13, 2008, President Bush signed into law the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. The bill was highly publicized, and sped through the legislative process in a mere seventeen days. This quick enactment was accomplished through tremendous bipartisan efforts and extensive cooperation between the legislative branch and the executive branch. While nearly every politician approved the bill, and lauded the great effect it would have on families and the economy, in reality it did little but cost the government (and taxpaying citizens) $152 billion. The passage of this bill came in the midst of a struggling economy, and Congress intended it to stimulate the economy and avoid or mitigate a recession. As can be seen from the events that have occured since the bill was signed into law, it has failed. This Note makes a painfully obvious observation that the bill never had a fighting chance to accomplish its desired objectives because of the flawed logic of Congress. This will be readily apparent by first looking at what the bill provided; second, looking at the purposes behind the provisions; and third, by pointing out the disconnect between the means Congress used and the desired ends. This Note concludes by suggesting that the best action for Congress in times of economic trouble is to do nothing. Â
How to Cite
.
THE FLAWED LOGIC OF CONGRESS IN THE ECONOMIC STIMULUS ACT OF 2008.
Journal of Law and Family Studies, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 1, mar. 2010.
Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlfs/article/view/293>. Date accessed: 22 dec. 2024.
Issue
Section
Statute Note
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).