COLORADO RIVER COMPACT ENTITLEMENTS, CLEARING UP MISCONCEPTIONS
Abstract
I was pleased to speak at the Stegner Symposium in March of 2007 about misconceptions surrounding the Colorado River Compact. This article documents and expands upon my oral presentation at the symposium. The misconceptions I address include these: (1) the 1922 Colorado River Compact Commissioners based the compact on mistaken hydrology; (2) they did not account for Native American water rights or the Republic of Mexico’s use of the river; (3) the compact is in need of revision; and (4) Lake Powell should be decommissioned. In my view, these misconceptions fail to recognize historical events surrounding the compact’s formation. More fundamentally, they ignore the legal context and effect of the compact, as well as the many acts of Congress that implement both the 1922 Colorado River Compact and the 1948 Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. We do well to remember why the 1922 and 1948 compacts exist and what great accomplishments they continue to be.
How to Cite
.
COLORADO RIVER COMPACT ENTITLEMENTS, CLEARING UP MISCONCEPTIONS.
Utah Environmental Law Review, [S.l.], v. 28, n. 1, feb. 2009.
Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlrel/article/view/100>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Symposium Essays
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).