LEGISLATING AGAINST PERPETUITY: THE LIMITS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH’S POWERS TO MODIFY OR TERMINATE CONSERVATION EASEMENTS
Abstract
Conservation easement laws provide a seemingly perfect legal equation for landowners to perpetually protect their land while circumnavigating both the law’s traditional suspicion of perpetual restrictions on land and the whims of present politics. But as the use of conservation easements continues to grow, and the supply of conservable private land diminishes, the role of organizations holding conservation easements will necessarily change. Over the next twenty years, it is likely that the institutional focus of the land trusts and government entities holding conservation easements will shift from the acquisition of new easements to the stewardship of existing easements. As conservation easements age, and the environmental, political, and social landscape evolves, the pressure to modify or even terminate easements will inevitably grow.
How to Cite
.
LEGISLATING AGAINST PERPETUITY: THE LIMITS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH’S POWERS TO MODIFY OR TERMINATE CONSERVATION EASEMENTS.
Utah Environmental Law Review, [S.l.], v. 29, n. 2, aug. 2009.
Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlrel/article/view/156>. Date accessed: 02 jan. 2025.
Issue
Section
Articles
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).