THE CLEAN AIR ACT’S NEW SOURCE REVIEW PROGRAM: BENEFICIAL TO PUBLIC HEALTH OR MERELY A SMOKE-AND-MIRRORS SCHEME?
Abstract
In 1970, Congress enacted the Clean Air Act (CAA), which aimed to protect public health by reducing air pollution and by maintaining safe levels of harmful emissions. In 1977, Congress amended certain provisions of the CAA to further strengthen the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect the public health from harmful air pollutants. These amendments sought to maintain acceptable levels of air quality by requiring newly constructed sources of pollution, such as electric utilities and other large emitters of pollutants, to obtain permits that would ensure compliance with national air standards. Despite the potential health benefits that could have been realized by the Clean Air Act and its 1977 New Source Review (NSR) amendments, the NSR program has led to mixed results and the public’s health has suffered as a consequence. The congressional mandate in 1970 and 1977 seemed very clear: “protect and enhance the quality of the Nation’s air resources so as to promote the public health.” With thirty years of hindsight, however, Congress’s message has been obscured greatly by corporate and political interests. The American public has been the victim of an elaborate smoke-and-mirrors scheme where public health appears to be the primary goal under the NSR program. In reality, electric utilities are emitting more than their share of dirty smoke while the federal executive branch, especially under former President George W. Bush, is providing mirrors to deflect the truth: the NSR program is failing to protect public health because of a lack of enforcement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
How to Cite
.
THE CLEAN AIR ACT’S NEW SOURCE REVIEW PROGRAM: BENEFICIAL TO PUBLIC HEALTH OR MERELY A SMOKE-AND-MIRRORS SCHEME?.
Utah Environmental Law Review, [S.l.], v. 29, n. 2, aug. 2009.
Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlrel/article/view/158>. Date accessed: 02 jan. 2025.
Issue
Section
Articles
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).