THE GRAY WOLF STALEMATE: WHY UTAH’S WOLF MANAGEMENT LAW THREATENS THE GRAY WOLF’S RECOVERY THROUGHOUT ITS HISTORICAL RANGE
Abstract
This Note intends to show that Utah's complete prohibition of wolves within the state, which is a significant portion of the gray wolf's historical and current range, makes the state unready to manage the wolves under federal statutory and regulatory guidelines. By contrast, the neighboring states of Montana, Idaho, and Washington are committed to managing at least fifteen packs, while Wyoming and Oregon committed to at least four and seven, respectively. The presence of gray wolves within Utah represents a vital component of continued gray wolf recovery, because as the gray wolf's population increases, corridors are necessary for dispersing gray wolves. While wolves were not reintroduced in Utah, Washington or Oregon-the Pacific Northwest states-have at least committed to managing and allowing dispersing wolves to establish packs and to facilitate continued recovery. In addition to the need for Utah to serve as a corridor for gray wolves, Utah has suitable habitat and was once part of the species' historical range. If court precedent rather than the 2011 Rider were followed, Utah would appropriately be considered a significant portion of the gray wolf's range, and the species could not have been delisted until Utah's regulatory mechanisms were changed to promote further recovery.
How to Cite
.
THE GRAY WOLF STALEMATE: WHY UTAH’S WOLF MANAGEMENT LAW THREATENS THE GRAY WOLF’S RECOVERY THROUGHOUT ITS HISTORICAL RANGE.
Utah Environmental Law Review, [S.l.], v. 32, n. 1, apr. 2012.
Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlrel/article/view/624>. Date accessed: 22 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Notes
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).