DIVIDING THE PIE – DEALING WITH SURPLUS AND DROUGHT: EXAMINING THE COLORADO RIVER COMPACT OF 1922
Abstract
As the Southwest endures a sixth year of record drought, it should come as no surprise that many water managers, public officials and water use stakeholders alike are examining the Colorado River Compact of 1922, and asking the question, “Is it time for change?” From my personal perspective—and from that of every Administration to serve from 1922 to the present, a span of eighty-five years—there is no compelling case to change the Compact. It’s long been my belief that the Compact was an inspired gift to future generations hammered out under extremely difficult circumstances. It represents the best of what happens when the seven Basin States and the Federal Government sit down to work for the common good. Is the Compact perfect? Did everyone get an equal deal? Of course not. Is it flexible? Is there room for evolving issues and the various states’ needs to be met? Absolutely!
How to Cite
.
DIVIDING THE PIE – DEALING WITH SURPLUS AND DROUGHT: EXAMINING THE COLORADO RIVER COMPACT OF 1922.
Utah Environmental Law Review, [S.l.], v. 28, n. 1, feb. 2009.
Available at: <https://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlrel/article/view/99>. Date accessed: 07 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Symposium Essays
Copyright Utah Law Review All Rights Reserved.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).